|
Kanjorski
Amendment Lays Out Objective Standards to Determine
Risk of Financial Companies to Economic System
WASHINGTON
- Congressman
Paul E. Kanjorski (D-PA), Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee
on Capital Markets, Insurance, and Government Sponsored Enterprises,
today released his amendment to the Financial Stability Improvement Act that
would empower federal regulators to rein in and dismantle financial firms that
are so large, inter-connected, or risky that their collapse would put at risk
the entire American economic system, even if those firms currently appear to be
well-capitalized and healthy. Therefore,
American taxpayers should no longer be on the hook for bailouts, as financial
companies would not be able to become "too big to fail." The Kanjorski
amendment outlines clear and objective standards for regulators to examine
financial companies and reduce the level of risk their activities pose to our
financial stability and our economy.
"No firm
should be considered to be ‘too big to fail.'
Financial firms that want to play in a casino need to have their own
resources to cover their bets and not assume that tax dollars are available in
reserve if their bets fail," said Chairman Kanjorski. "If my amendment is accepted, financial firms
would need to demonstrate to regulators that their failure would not undermine
the financial stability of the American economy. To maintain a vibrant economy, financial
companies need to take risks, but we cannot afford the risk of losing our
entire economy. Having made the
difficult decision last year to rescue our economic system with the use of
federal tax dollars, I hope that no Congress will need to face a similar
situation in the future."
The Kanjorski amendment expands on a segment of the Financial
Stability Improvement Act, by enabling federal action to address financial
companies that are deemed "too big to fail" before resolution authority is
needed. The amendment transfers such
mitigatory action from the Federal Reserve to the Financial Services Oversight
Council and establishes objective standards for the Council to effectively
evaluate companies to determine whether they are systemically risky. Additionally, the amendment provides clear
checks and balances by requiring the Council to consult with the President
before taking extraordinary mitigatory actions.
A financial company also has the right to appeal any actions.
Chairman
Kanjorski noted that he intends to continue to coordinate with the European
Union to ensure that American-based firms are not put at an economic
disadvantage under his amendment. "After
meeting with many European Union officials and Members of the European
Parliament earlier this year, I realized that we share many of the same
concerns on both sides of the Atlantic. If we work in cooperation with one another
now, we can establish reasonable standards to protect the global economy from
catastrophe."
A summary
of the Kanjorski amendment follows:
-
Objective
Standards. Size is by no means the
only factor to determine if a financial company is "too big to fail." The recent financial crisis has shown that
many other factors can also cause a company to become a systemic risk. Rather, the amendment considers a variety of
objective standards to determine if financial firms pose a threat to our
financial stability, including the scope, scale, exposure, leverage, interconnectedness
of financial activities, as well as size of the financial company. The Kanjorski amendment does not cap the size
of financial institutions.
-
Mitigatory
Actions. If a financial company is
deemed systemically risky, the Kanjorski amendment provides responsible
preventative actions to protect our financial system and curtail those
risks. These include modifying existing prudential standards, imposing
conditions on or terminating activities, limiting mergers and acquisitions, and
in the most extreme cases, breaking up the company.
-
Protects
American Competitiveness. We have
learned from this financial crisis that we are all connected. The Kanjorski amendment addresses the concern
that our regulatory system works in conjunction with those around the
globe. Currently, the European Union is considering similar action, and
harmonized regulations would benefit both economies.
Click here to view
the text of the Kanjorski amendment.
###
|